In
continuous wave (CW) EPR spectroscopy, it is customary to hold the
microwave frequency constant and sweep the applied magnetic field
through the EPR spectrum. One could, in principle, hold the magnetic
field constant and sweep the microwave frequency. However, this is
seldom done because the microwave components, and, particularly, the
microwave resonator in which the sample is placed, are narrow band. The
bandwidth of a matched resonator Δf is given by the expression Δf = fo/Q, where fo is the microwave resonant frequency and Q is
the quality factor of the resonator. Thus, the bandwidth can be
increased by increasing the resonant frequency and also by decreasing
the Q-value. We have developed a W-band (94 GHz) loop-gap resonator (LGR) that has a Q-value of about 100 [1].
Use of this resonator results in a 3 dB bandwidth of about 1 GHz, which
makes microwave frequency sweeps feasible. So-called “frequency agile”
EPR spectroscopy at W-band is the subject of this paper.
Rapid
passage effects in EPR are well known. They arise from the sweep of the
nominally static magnetic field through resonance while applying a
sinusoidal magnetic field modulation of sufficiently high frequency and
amplitude in the presence of sufficiently high incident microwave power.
Weger has classified the various types of effects that can be observed [2].
A single sweep of the magnetic field through an EPR spectrum, if
sufficiently rapid, can be expected to tilt the magnetizations of all
lines in the spectrum such that the magnetization of each line has a
component transverse to the applied field in the rotating frame. With
the applied magnetic field, static after the completion of the single
sweep, these magnetizations can be expected to precess at different
rates as free induction decay (FID) occurs in the familiar manner of FT
NMR. However, the possibility of developing a robust EPR analog to FT
NMR using magnetic field sweep is remote because of the technical
difficulty in producing a sufficiently rapid sweep and the complications
arising from induced eddy currents in metallic components of the
microwave resonator. In this paper, we show results of analogous
experiments where the microwave frequency rather than the magnetic field
is swept. The gyromagnetic ratio of the free electron, 2.8 MHz/G, can
be used to compare field and frequency sweeps. Eddy currents in the
sample resonator are avoided and sweeps of frequency can be much more
rapid than sweeps of field.
We
have previously described replacement of the customary 100 kHz magnetic
field modulation by sinusoidal modulation of the microwave frequency [3].
In the present work, the microwave frequency is swept in either a
triangular manner or a trapezoidal manner across a substantial portion
of the EPR spectrum (see Fig. 1). Rapid sweeps were obtained with the apparatus of Fig. 2,
where the output of this circuit is further mixed with a Q-band source
to arrive at 94 GHz. Frequency deviations can be as great as 1 GHz at
low repetition rates or as great as 40 MHz at a repetition rate of 2
MHz, with various intermediate combinations also allowed. The frequency
sweep rates and maximum deviations are addressed in detail in section
1.4.
Frequency-sweep
waveforms: (a) Example display of one of the triangular frequency-sweep
waveforms used. (b) The trapezoidal waveform used for the data
acquisition in Figs. 7 and and8.8. The H0 lines show the position of the EPR line center in ...
V-band
source: YIG-tuned oscillator (YTO) translated by a fixed frequency Gunn
diode oscillator (Gunn Osc). LPFs isolate the mixer from oscillator
harmonics. The BPF passes the upper sideband from the mixer.
The
method was applied to nitroxide spin labels in aqueous solution. The
spectra are pure absorption in character if the sweep is sufficiently
slow, but exhibit wiggles at more rapid sweeps. This class of
experiments was previously explored in proton high-resolution NMR
spectroscopy at much lower radio frequencies and longer relaxation
times, where it was known as “correlation spectroscopy [4].”
As technology improved, NMR correlation spectroscopy was replaced by
pulse methods followed by Fourier transformation to produce spectra. In
EPR, correlation spectroscopy was first reported by Stoner et al.using the so-called “trityl” radical, which has unusually long relaxation times [5].
They used magnetic field sweep across the single-line spectrum. The
working hypothesis presented here is that microwave frequency sweep
across the spectrum is an optimum experimental approach for many EPR
experiments.
1.2. W-band bridge
The W-band bridge used in the experiments described here is shown in Fig. 3.
This bridge was developed at the National Biomedical EPR Center and
previously utilized in somewhat modified configurations in sinusoidal
microwave frequency modulation (FM) and saturation recovery (SR)
experiments [3,6].
The bridge incorporates multiple frequency translations to generate
coherent W-band frequencies from a time-locked synthesizer array, but
only the arms used in the experiments described here are shown in Fig. 3.
The outputs of the two synthesizers—nominally, 2 and 3 GHz—are
upconverted by mixing with the output of a 33 GHz Gunn diode oscillator [7]
in the Q-band upconversion mixers to produce 35 and 36 GHz. The
synthesizers have a common time base and are thermally stabilized so
that they are coherent over the length of the experiment. The 35 GHz
Q-band output is then upconverted by mixing with the output of a tunable
V-band Gunn diode oscillator—nominally, 59 GHz—in the W-band
upconversion mixer. The W-band arm output is directed toward the sample
resonator through a high-directivity directional coupler (the “resonator
coupler”).
Frequency-swept W-band EPR bridge functional schematic. See Fig. 2 for
components key. Nominally, the incident irradiation arm synthesizer is
set to 2 GHz, and the reference arm synthesizer is set to 3 GHz. 33 GHz
is upconverted to 35 GHz and then to ...
The
microwave power reflected from the sample resonator in the vicinity of
resonance can be determined from the reflection coefficient Γ:
Γ=(β?1)?jQu2Δωωo(β+1)+jQu2Δωωo
(1)
where β is the coupling factor, Qu is the unloaded quality factor of the sample resonator (with sample; unloaded refers to “loading by the transmission line”), ωo is
the resonant frequency, and Δω is the frequency deviation from
resonance. In a conventional EPR experiment, Δω is nominally set to zero
and maintained by an automatic frequency control (AFC) circuit. In a
swept frequency experiment, Δω is swept from some nominal negative
value, through resonance, to some nominal positive value. The direct
implication is a frequency dependent offset to the baseline of a
spectrum. The increase in the reflection coefficient can be appreciable
at the extremes of a frequency sweep. For example, if a sample resonator
with sample has Qu =
200 and a return loss of 35 dB (|Γ| = 0.0178) at a resonant frequency
of 94 GHz, the return loss of the real part of the reflection
coefficient at a 20 MHz offset from resonance is 34.1 dB while the
return loss of the imaginary part of reflection coefficient is 27.4 dB.
Baseline correction is implemented by subtracting the off-EPR resonance
signal from the on-EPR resonance signal, as addressed later in this
paper.