Megan Scudellari Nature Reports Stem Cells Published online: 7 May 2009 | doi:10.1038/stemcells.2009.71
Analyses of individual stem cells are gaining momentum, but technological barriers persist
Stem cells are defined by their
remarkable ability to self-renew and differentiate into specialized
cells. But even after careful sorting, a single population of stem cells
is dynamic: some divide rapidly and others more slowly; some
differentiate, others self-renew; some can give rise to more lineages
than others. Because of this variation, population studies of stem cells
are unable to accurately address essential questions, such as defining
discrete steps from a single stem cell to a complex population of cells.
Image of a blood stem cell dividing in real time. (Reya lab, Duke University)
"There are very few people who pay
attention to the advantages and importance of studying single cells,"
says Ron McKay, chief of the Laboratory of Molecular Biology at the
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke in Bethesda,
Maryland. "They talk as if they do. They use a FACS machine and act as
if they have single-cell data. But they don't. They have data on a
population, and that's a completely different thing."
Although single-cell analysis is still
too new to have generated a wealth of literature about the lineages a
single stem cell can follow, the genes it can express and the way it
behaves, voices from many different fields are emphasizing its
importance.
Taking a look
Imaging individual cells is one of the
most sought-after achievements in cell biology, but it is perhaps the
most challenging. To image single stem cells, researchers use time-lapse
photography to take pictures at a high resolution every 2–3 minutes,
often for days at a time. Not only must the cells' movements be
constantly tracked to keep them in frame, the thousands of resulting
images must be processed, manually scrutinized and statistically
analyzed.
At the University of Waterloo in
Ontario, Canada, chemical engineer Eric Jervis generates lineage trees
of many generations of stem cells and makes movies of individual cells
differentiating or self-renewing. But the research requires robotic
microscopes, canyons of hard-drive space and custom software. Even with
the help of talented students, the equipment design took a year to
complete1. "It's technically challenging. It requires a renaissance-type
researcher to be able to span robotic imaging, database and data mining
and stem cell biology. If you don't have all three, you can't do
anything," says Jervis.
Despite his willingness to share the
details of his system, Jervis is more likely to receive cell samples in
the mail for imaging than he is to have other labs wanting to adopt the
technique, he says. At the long-term live-cell imaging core facility for
the Canadian Stem Cell Network, Jervis now receives samples each week
from labs across Canada in need of his tools.
In the United States, even with the
support of the National Institutes of Health infrastructure, it took
McKay more than six years to construct his stem cell imaging system:
building a live-cell chamber, constructing a microscope and camera to
track and image the cells, and developing software to handle the data.
"We spent an enormous amount of time figuring out how to do these
experiments. But in the end, I think it was worth it," says McKay. Using
the system, he recently published an analysis of how central nervous
system stem cells transition from one state to another, including the
cells' response to ciliary neurotrophic growth factor, a cytokine
thought to direct neural stem cells toward an astrocytic fate2.